Connect with us

News

Sifting through the blame game

Published

on

JUST IN: Armed soldiers raid Nigerian newspaper offices, arrest journalists

Daily Trust’s editor-in-chief, Mannir Dan-Ali, a veteran of the nation’s rugged media terrain is a man who exudes confidence. He was, however, rattled, nay, speechless on Sunday, January 6, when gun-toting, battle-ready soldiers invaded the premises of the newspaper in Abuja, the nation’s capital.

Perhaps the nearest brush with hostile security forces the newspaper, under him, had was during the Goodluck Jonathan era when copies of its publications were seized in some states.

The present siege was unprecedented for the official.

A similar siege had earlier been carried out on its Maiduguri office that day. The soldiers after descending on the newspaper’s office in the war-torn northern city arrested a reporter. Their mission was apparently not ended as they demanded to see one of the newspaper editors, who appeared to be their main target.

“For four hours on Sunday, January 6th 2019, armed soldiers who came in five vehicles occupied the head office of Media Trust Limited, publishers of the Daily Trust titles sending away journalists and other staff,” a troubled Mr Dan-Ali said in a subsequent statement he issued that caught the attention of a stunned nation.

“Before the siege was called off at about 9.30 pm, the soldiers has (sic) ransacked the newsroom and carted away dozens of computers and effectively strangulated the production of the Monday edition of the paper,” the official added.

He explained that at about 4 p.m., another detachment of soldiers and plain-clothed security officials went to the Maiduguri regional office of the company and conducted a search.

The soldiers took away the Regional Bureau Chief, Uthman Abubakar, and a reporter, Ibrahim Sawab. A production staff who was taken away from the Abuja head office alongside the firm’s computers was released after a period of detention at the Mogadishu barracks in Abuja.

The irate soldiers were not done yet, apparently.

In Lagos, seven vehicles with armed soldiers arrived the offices of the newspaper at Textile Labour House in Agidingbi at about 9 p.m. After driving out perplexed staff, they sealed the premises.

Why would soldiers invade a newspaper house in broad daylight in a democratic nation ahead of a general election, Nigerians waited to know with bated breath.

Mr Dan-Ali explained.

“We have not been told of the reason for the military operation against this newspaper but suspect it may have to do with the lead story of the Daily Trust on Sunday that dwelt on the military’s effort to retake some towns recently reported to have been lost to insurgents.

“Another clue is that during the invasion of our premises both in Maiduguri and in Abuja, the military men were asking for the reporters who wrote the story.”

Controversial Story?

The siege occurred a few hours after the newspaper published a report detailing how the Nigerian military assembled troops and equipment in preparation for a ‘massive operation’ to dislodge Boko Haram and retake Baga and five other towns in Borno from the insurgents.

The army had earlier denied reports that the towns had been seized.

The military has suffered a series of defeats in some key towns in the embattled region, which it had tried to downplay in recent weeks.

It had also appealed to the media to stop “exaggerating the losses suffered in the hands of the insurgents whom the federal government claimed in the past had been ‘techincally defeated”.

That Daily Trust decided to publish a report that revealed military operations to regain the lost territory did not go down well with the top brass of the military.

Sabre Rattling Military

A confrontational military later issued a statement explaining why it unleashed its men on unarmed media workers.

“The disclosure of classified security information amounts to a breach of national security and run contrary to Sections 1 and 2 of the Official Secrets Act,” a belligerent army spokesman, Sani Usman said shortly.

He said the story gave the Boko Haram sect ‘‘prior notice of the Army’s plans while also alerting it to prepare against the Nigerian military.”

Mr Usman said the publication sabotaged the planned operation and “put the lives of troops in imminent and clear danger.”

“We would like to state that the ‘invitation’ of those responsible for divulging military plans was done with the best of intention in order to make them realise the import of such acts to our national security,” he said.

The spokesperson did not, however, explain why the military needed to deploy armed soldiers to ‘invite’ the journalists who had stirred the hornet’s nest.

‘Bad Move’

The presidency, obviously aware of the furore the matter would generate, quickly moved in to douse tension.

President Muhammadu Buhari is seeking reelection this year. Accused several times in the past of crippling citizens civil rights, the military action on a newspaper house was clearly a bad move for campaigns.

The presidency then sought to rein in the rampaging soldiers and extinguish a raging fire.

“The Federal Government has directed the military to vacate the premises of @daily_trust and the order has been complied with,” Garba Shehu, a presidential spokesperson, said via a tweet on his handle @GarShehu.

“Issues between the military and the newspaper as they affect the coverage of the war in the Northeast will be resolved through dialogue,” he added.

The army later withdrew its officials and released the detained journalists. It is not clear if they also released the firm’s computers and gadgets it seized.

Belated?

Despite the presidency’s olive branch gesture, the expected backlash came in quickly and in no small measure.

The International Press Institute threw the first salvo.

“We would like to mention here that the Nigerian security services appear to have adopted a habit of arresting and detaining journalists for their investigative reporting on perceived sensitive subjects.

“In August last year, the security forces arrested Samuel Ogundipe, a journalist with the Premium Times, for his report about a letter sent by the inspector general of police to the vice president detailing actions of the former director of the State Security Service. The police demanded that Ogundipe reveal his sources.

“We hope that you will keep the promise that President Muhammadu Buhari and you made at the IPI World Congress to uphold media freedom and create a conducive climate for independent media to thrive in Nigeria,” it wrote Mr Buhari.

“Where an infraction is alleged, the best option is to follow due process and civility; not kneejerk, not intimidation and spread of fear in the civil society.

“We have gone too far in search of law and order regime than to countenance such display of raw power and emotion over due process,” the Newspapers Association of Nigeria also said in a statement.

Amnesty International also showed its displeasure.

“Nigerian authorities have obligation to protect freedom of the press @daily_trust as provided by the constitution & International human rights laws. #FreePress #Nigeria,” it said.

“Attack on @Dailytrust offices and arbitrary arrest of their reporters, is an attack on Nigerians’ freedom of expression and media freedom and an affront to basic principles of human rights and rule of law central to democracy,” a prominent pressure civil society group, SERAP also said.

So Who Gets The Blame?

Analysts believe the clash was inevitable especially in the heat of an ongoing counter-insurgency operation, which the military seems to be under pressure to conclude finally and decisively.

While the press is constitutionally empowered to keep the nation informed on developments in the society, the army is trained to secure the territorial integrity of the country through at times covert operations that it wants to remain secret.

That always sets the tone for clashes between the two institutions globally.

As usual with such matters, opinions are varied and divisive.

Emman Usman Shehu (PhD), Director, International Institute of Journalism, sees it as a classic case of two wrongs (not making a right).

“It is a classic example of two wrongs not making a right. It once again underscores the failure of our various institutions to play by established rules at all times,” he told PREMIUM TIMES.

He criticises the actions of both sides.

“It is true that the media is in the business of providing news by there is that age-old caveat of providing news RESPONSIBLY, taking into cognisance not just national security but the safety of citizens. Nigerian soldiers are first of all citizens of the country and their lives too matter.

“Daily Trust’s shocking editorial naivety in this matter also shows the organisation’s failure to take into consideration that safety of its staff who could easily be brutalised in the event of an extreme backlash from the military, know the historical precedents.

“The front page prominence given to the planned military operation showed that Daily Trust was not in the mood of being discreet regardless of the danger it posed to the lives of the troops.

“The report itself was in no way innocuous as has been argued in some quarters. It not only indicated a large scale operation in specific locations but also revealed where the troops would be drawn from. These are actionable details for the insurgents.

“The military’s indignation in the given circumstance is understandable, but the attendant action is totally unacceptable. What took place further discredits the military’s reputation as not being capable of working within the ambits of the country’s laws.

“There are more civil and lawful ways that the military would have approached the issue including working with the Attorney General of the Federation to press charges against Daily Trust. The military operation as witnessed which took place in at least three cities, with journalists taken into custody and publishing paraphernalia confiscated is not acceptable even in a democracy,” he said.

Emmanuel Ogbeche, FCT chairman of the Nigeria Union of Journalists (NUJ) takes a different route.

He tells this newspaper the Nigerian military went overboard in its reaction over the story.

“The military should have used its information and publicity unit to reach out to the editors of Daily Trust and forcefully make their concerns known,” he says. “A simple telephone call, an email would have sufficed even if you needed the reporters/editors of the newspaper at your office. But to lay siege to the offices at different locations signposts that it was aimed at crippling the operations of the newspaper.”

He said in this age of technological advancement, there is nothing about troops’ movement that is even ‘secret.’

“Google Earth alone is enough to give away the massing up of Nigerian troops because one will imagine that the Boko Haram terrorists have the requisite technology and possibly moles embedded inside the military,” he said. “If you check Stratfor site online, you can easily find where U.S. carriers are everywhere in the world.”

“The military ought to engage in confidence building with the media and populace. You cannot always antagonise a key institution as the media,” he adds. “The media too owes the country responsible reporting and being sensitive to some issues such as the war against insurgency.”

Farooq Kperogi, a columnist and professor of Journalism and Citizen Media at Kennesaw State University, Georgia, USA tells PREMIUM TIMES two options the military could have explored.

“They had two options: officially write to refute the report and request to be given a prominent space for their rebuttal to be published or directly complain to the editor or the E-I-C of the newspaper by pointing out exactly why the report injures national security,” he said.

“Invading the offices of the newspaper, confiscating its computers and arresting its reporters are most certainly crude tactics of intimidation that solve no problem at all,” the prominent columnist added.

He also said Daily Trust would be justified under the law to sue the military authorities for loss of revenue as a consequence of this invasion and for a violation of its constitutionally guaranteed right to inform the public and hold government accountable to the people.

A public affairs analyst, Abdullai Haruna, also weighed in. He takes a middle ground.

“Irresponsible time we live in, journalists publishing the operational movement of the military against a dangerous side like the Boko Haram. What stops the army from inviting the top management of the media house to discuss the grave implication of sharing valuable and sensitive operational procedures of the military?” he asks.

“And why would journalists be the platform where military tactics are used to get to the insurgents? Are there moles in the military who work in tandem with journalists to feed the insurgents with adequate information?” he said.

However, Isuma Isuma, a public affairs analyst says there is no justification for the invasion.

“It (invasion) is terrorism in itself. It impedes on the right of the workers and free press which has become an essential element of governance globally. If the government had any grouse with any publications from the paper’s stable, it should have employed the usual open and legal channels of reaching out to the editors and management to explain and clear the air,” Mr Isuma said.

“That was not employed rather, violent measures of laying siege to the paper offices across the nation became their best option. That was condemnable. I must say the paper must go to court to ensure the preservation of its desire to have access to information and stop future invasion of its operations and other media outlets,” he added.

Adolphus Mawolo, a reporter with the West Africa Democracy Radio, Dakar, Senegal also told PREMIUM TIMES that diplomatic channels ought to have been explored by parties.

“The siege was an unnecessary use of force which attracted an unnecessary international attention to an army notorious for extrajudicial killings and arbitrary arrests and detention,” Mr Mawolo said.

“The newspaper said it released general and not specific information about the operation to retake Baga and five other towns in the northeast. Ideally, the army needed to express their disappointment to the Daily Trust without a public display of coercive force,” he adds.

“Granted without conceding to the fact that Daily Trust erred in its reportage of military operations against insurgents, the ideal thing to do was to approach the court and obtain a restraining order against the media house and not laying siege and harassing journalists,” says Gbadebo Asiwaju, an editor with Leadership Newspapers.

Legality

“There is no justification for the invasion in the eyes of the law. It didn’t follow due process and it assaulted the freedom of information law,” says Isichei Samson, an Abuja based lawyer.

“If there is any clash or crisis between both, they should resort to the law or diplomacy to resolve such matters. The army should have explored legal or diplomatic procedure when it felt the newspaper by its action put national security in jeopardy instead of self-help.

“Even in the military era when press freedom was curbed, the military juntas at times invited editors to parleys whenever they felt uncomfortable about any report,” Mr Isichei said.

“Security Matters, Not A Tea Party”

The media is failing in its responsibility to exercise discretion and necessary restraints required for ensuring peace and stability of the fragile system says an Abuja based security expert, ‘Bakare Demola’.

He requested his real name be withheld.

“Driven only by information dissemination and probably commercial interests, the press appears to have jeopardised national security to the extent that it now looks as if it is at war with the government and especially, the military,” he adds.

“I personally saw the recent military incursion into Daily Trust premises coming,” he added. “The Nigerian media seem to have “weaponised” information dissemination using it to denigrate either the government or the security forces while reporting security matters. This is unbecoming.

“We seem to forget that democracy, human rights and press freedom are useful only to the extent that the geographical expression necessary to express them exists and remains peaceful.

“If Nigeria is ‘overrun’, for instance, through carelessness and indiscretion on the part of any of us, the democracy, human rights and press freedom we desire and flaunts shall inadvertently be in peril.”

He, however, advised the ‘overstressed’ army not to engage the press in “another unnecessary war of attrition”.

“The newspaper erred in reporting such a sensitive information. By their action, they put the military operation in jeopardy. They gave the insurgents information about an impending attack by troops on their locations which is not good,” Akinsode Sunday, a security trainer in Jos also tells PREMIUM TIMES.

“They could as well as waited for the military to carry out its operations before reporting not before. And really, it’s not every information, a newspaper has that it should report/publish. The media work comes with a lot of responsibilities,” he adds.

Global Best Practices

The arguments would no doubt continue for a while. But like a media trainer, Deborah Shapley, puts it in her journal article, The Media and National Security, such conflicts will inevitably occur as the media seeks to keep readers aware of happenings, state authorities will rather want kept ‘secret’.

At times, the press may be forced to make tough calls, she says.

“Defence news whether in the newspapers or on TV ought to be able to do more. A strong case can be made that in a democracy, the media must play the role in assisting that voters are well informed so they will be less influenced by demagoguery or propaganda.

“The media should find ways to cover national security subjects more extensively and in greater depth even if this sometimes may mean discarding professional rigidities,” Ms Shapley submits.

News

Kogi Judiciary Director dies following 9 Months Unpaid Salaries

Published

on

 

Tension has risen in Kogi State as a result of the death of one of the directors working in the judiciary of Kogi state.

Mr. Zekery Aguye, a Magistrate and Deputy Chief Registrar (Litigation), died last week Tuesday after losing a protracted battle with prostrate cancer.

He died at the National Hospital, Abuja, where he was initially being treated before he was forced to discontinue the treatment due to his inability to offset his medical bills.

Asked to confirm the news of the death, the Chief Registrar of the High Court, Mr. Yahaya Adamu, who was practically crestfallen, narrated the pathetic and unfortunate circumstances that led to the death of the director whom he described as one of the best hands in the state judiciary.

“I am very sorry to say that even as we subscribe to the will of Almighty Allah, who gives and takes life, you and I know certainly that sometimes there are deaths that are evitable. In this particular one, we feel it may have been further delayed if we had continued to manage his ailment as we were doing in the past before the judiciary was financially grounded.”

He said the battle over Mr. Aguye’s life started since two years ago when he was diagnosed of the disease.

He said with quick appropriate response and the concerted attention of the family and the judiciary, the deceased received the right and necessary medical treatment.

“He was taken to the National Hospital where he was treated to the extent that he even started driving his car by himself having survived the critical period of the illness that also affected his spine.

“You see, when it all started, we thought it was one of those usual ailments. But when it became obvious that he needed to be handled by specialists we headed for the National Hospital.

“You will agree with me that treatment there’s highly capital intensive. So, in conjunction with the family and other well-wishers he was revived to Allah’s glory.

“He was subsequently placed on drugs and periodic examinations by the hospital which we consistently complied with. This processes costs between 400 and 500,000 thousand naira monthly, depending on the result of the tests. By the grace of God and with the cooperation of the family and others we were coping with the management of the illness.

“However, we started having problems with his treatment as from the middle of last year when Kogi State Judiciary started facing funding crises. At this point, his salary, allowances and even the little assistance the judiciary was giving him ceased to come anymore. His care suddenly became the exclusive responsibility of the wife and the family alone.

“You’ll surely agree with me that couple with the children’s demands it will be difficult for the wife to bear this enormous burden. As a matter of fact, before he finally gave up the ghost, he was withdrawn from the National Hospital for lack of fund! It’s at the critical point of his death that he was rushed back to the hospital by which time it was already too late.

“So I will like to use this medium to ask well-meaning Nigerians to plead with His Excellency, Governor Yahaya Bello, to save Kogi judiciary and the state similar calamities by releasing the judiciary funds so we can pay the nine months we are owing our workers.

“As I speak with you, many others are hospitalized, their children withdrawn from schools and some even homeless resulting from tenancy problems with their respective landlords” the Chief Registrar added.

The Kogi State Chairman Judiciary Staff Union of Nigeria (JUSUN), Comrade Emmanuel Waniko, who also felt that Mr. Aguye’s death cannot be entirely divorced from the non-payment of judiciary workers’ salaries since July 2018 which now amounts to nine months.

He said the union was still shocked and mourning the unexpected demise of the director. He said nobody in the judiciary would have contemplated losing him now when he was believed to have survived the critical period of the illness and was recuperating.

Linking the death to the ongoing strike resulting from unpaid salaries, he recalled the content of the affidavit he deposed to in the case instituted aginst Governor Bello and the state’s Chief Judge, Hon. Justice Nasiru Ajanah, at the National Industrial Court by the union before this tragic incident. He noted that he had stated there that “the staff of Kogi State Judiciary are hungry, sick and disillusioned without any hope as to know when the subventions will be released to pay thier salaries and emoluments.”

“To buttress that, he asked: “So, is this kind of condition not traumatic enough for even the healthy not to talk of somebody just recovering from such a sickness as cancer? Mark you, we have also lost, similar circumstances, Mr. Benjamin Ameloko, an Area Court Judge and Mr. Isah Salifu, a member of the Upper Area Court.”

The Chairman said it has come to the right time that the state government realise that no amount of deliberate and systematic depletion of the Magistrates, Judges and workers of the judiciary would make the union succumb to subverting the judiciary, as an institution, to the whims and caprices of a single individual at the expense of the Nigerian constitution, the laws of Kogi State and the responsibilities given to the judiciary as the last hope of the common man.

Recalling the genesis of the three-months-old strike commenced since December last year and the state governor’s responses so far, he said the union had no other option than than to embark on the strike when after non-release of subventions for payment of salaries and overhead costs for six months, workers could no longer go to work and offices were no longer conducive for working due to lack of basic working materials like stationery.

He said the union was surprised to hear the governor mention, during his budget presentation in January 2019, after being owed six months salaries resulting in the declaration of the strike in December, that the issue of table-payment or staff data capturing became conditions upon which staff would be paid their legitimately earned salaries.

He said the state government has refused to pay judiciary its subventions and have demonstrated that neither the plight of judiciary workers nor the citizens suffering from the closure of the courts mattered by blatantly refusing to constitute any negotiation team with JUSUN as obtained in sane climes.

“Instead, the governor chose to further abuse our sensibilities on 8th March 2019, the second time he Will speak on the strike, in the text of his address to the people of Kogi State on the eve of the State’s House of Assembly election.

“To us, it is the peak of insensitivity and man’s psychological oppression and inhumanity to man when you owe somebody his legitimate due and you keep asking the person to tow a particular path before you will pay him! This, to us, is unacceptable especially when you know fully well that the path you have asked for is illegal and unknown to law. When you are the one that constituted the Judicial Service Commission that is saddled with the responsibility of constantly verifying the composition of the judiciary workers which it is doing periodically, how do you turn around to usurp that power from them?

“If I may ask, if it is not a deliberate and calculated design to punish the judiciary and it’s workers without provocation, when has it become the responsibility of the state’s House of Assembly to intervene in industrial matters? When we were agitating for N30,000 minimum wage or when ASUU declared strike did the Federal Government resort to the National Assembly or it constituted negotiation teams on the two occasions? That’s sincerity of purpose if I may say. But in our own case, and after owing us for eight months and aware that our members are dying of hunger and sickness and cannot pay school fees and house rents, the governor said, just to further torture us mentally, that our salaries are in the bank and if we want it, we must first obey his command. You know what it means if you put some maize in a cocked but transparent bottle and you ask the chicken to feed from it? That’s exactly what he means.

“We are yet to know how our request for unpaid salaries amounts to politicization nor how our insistence on respect for the rule of law and separation of powers translates to “politicization of institution” except there’s something else we don’t know that we’re suffering from” he said.

He also quoted the Kogi State governor saying: His Excellency also said “The refusal of the leadership of the Kogi State Judiciary to forward their staff payroll for the Pay Parade with the collusion of JUSUN leaders is well documented.”

On our part, we’re in no collusion with anbody but we’re always prepared to abide by any rules or working conditions recommended or stipulated by the Judicial Service Commission of Kogi State which members were appointed by the governor. This is in line with the principles guiding the operations of the Federal Judicial Service Commission and the Legislative Service Commission. Asking for the take-over of our salary payment by agents of the executive connotes a dangerous motive that targets the emasculation of the judiciary which is detrimental to the fearless administration of justice in Kogi State” he said.

Comrade Waniko also maintained that rather than petitioning the National Judicial Council against the Hon. Chief Judge as disclosed by the governor, he would have been better off complying with the provisions of the constitution by releasing the funds of the judiciary to the heads of courts and allowing the Auditor-General of the state to audit the accounts of the judiciary when it is due.

“No law of this country lays any condition precedent to such release. It is therefore an illegality for the government to act contrary to the rule of law by keeping the funds accruing to the judiciary in the bank.

“So, as we have buried the deceased and are still mourning, we plead that if truly, “monies amounting to several months salaries due to Kogi State Civil Servants working in the Judiciary are sitting in the banks” as said by His Excellency, he should kindly order the payment of judiciary subventions to avoid further agonies” the JUSUN Chairman pleaded.

Kogiflame.com

Continue Reading

News

Kenyan Court proposes lowering of sex ‘consent age’ to 16

Published

on

 

Three senior judges in Kenya have proposed lowering the age of sexual consent to 16 years from the current 18 years, The Standard reports.

The paper says the three Court of Appeal judges are opposing lengthy jail terms imposed on young men for “sleeping with teens who were willing to be and appeared to be adults”.

The judges cited a case where they reversed a jail term of 15 years imposed on a man for making a 17-year-old girl pregnant, says the newspaper.

The judges also said underage girls and boys often engage in sexual relations “with their eyes fully open”, reports the paper.

“Our prisons are teeming with young men serving lengthy sentences for having had sexual intercourse with adolescent girls whose consent has been held to be immaterial because they were under 18 years”, the judges are quoted as saying.

Continue Reading

News

#PrayForMozambique: Over 1.8m People affected by Cyclone Idai – UN

Published

on

 

The UN humanitarian agency, Ocha, says more than 1.8 million people in Mozambique have been affected by Cyclone Idai and some of them are in critical life threatening situations.

Aid agencies are warning that thousands of survivors have yet to receive any help, 12 days after it made landfall in the country.

Mozambique’s Minister of Land and Environment, Celso Correia says efforts are being made to get food, shelter, water and medicine to people sheltering on higher ground.

He said the rescue need was coming down as the water receded but warned the area would take years to recover.

BBC

 

Continue Reading
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement

Trending